California Assembly Representative Jim Beall is back with another attempt to shut down destructive use of child custody evaluations. This new Assembly Bill 2475 has grown out of his failure in 2009 to pass his Assembly Bill 612 that wrongly aimed to ban discussion of parental alienation in family law courts. This time around, AB 2475 is on more solid ground as it aims to strip quasi-judicial immunity from private family court appointed experts such as psychological and custody evaluators. This would provide a legal fallback for civil suits for egregious cases of misconduct by these professionals.
Failed AB 612 from 2009
Last year, Jim Beall wanted to outlaw the discussion of parental alienation in family law cases. We and many other organizations that support shared parenting and protecting children from abuse and neglect vehemently opposed the AB 612 legislation he introduced. AB 612 was nothing but whitewashing of emotional child abuse to enable abusers to get away with hurting children and in many cases rewarding them for doing so. That bill, AB 612, was gutted by legislators who understood that parental alienation is a real phenomenon. Beall later withdrew the bill.
Read more…
| Child Custody, Children, Courts, CPS, Divorce, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Parental Alienation, Politics, Psychology |
| California, California AB 2475, California AB 612, California Coalition for Families and Children, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Child Protective Services, Children, CPS, Divorce, Domestic Violence, emotional abuse, false abuse allegations, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Government Abuse, Jim Beall, Judge Lisa Schall, Legal, National Organization of Women, Parental Alienation, personality disorder, shared parenting, Stephen Doyne, United States |
We sometimes get emails from our readers asking about the mix of information on our web site. Some readers wonder why we write about topics that seemingly have nothing to do with each other. Many of our readers are interested in the family law abuse and judicial corruption stories, others appreciate the coverage of health topics, and yet others find the stories about police abuse tactics match their own experiences. But what do they all have in common? The answer is they are all tied together by the involvement of government in abusing its duties to the public to uphold the law, avoiding conflicts of interest and bias, and staying away from corruption. In this article, I’ll be comparing examples of what I’ve learned about the abusive conduct of the FDA with the abusive conduct of family law courts. They are both excellent examples of how the United States has strayed a long distance down a very dark road that leads to becoming an abusive totalitarian state that views its citizens as slaves to be controlled for its own profit and power.
Violating Civil and Human Rights For Job Security, Power, and Profit
We prominently feature stories of abuse, corruption, and persecution by out of control government intent on building job security and power by crushing opponents and inventing fictional “crimes” and “crises” to “justify” their abuses and budgets. They commonly do all of this and more not only in violation of the law but also against any reasonable norm for moral and ethical behaviors for governments and government employees. While our readers may be familiar with the pattern of government abuse and corruption in their own experiences or those of family and friends who have been badly harmed by it, they may not be familiar with similar trangressions in other areas.
Read more…
| Books, Civil Rights, Courts, Crime, Government Abuse, Health & Nutrition, Legal, Police, Politics, Prosecutor, Reviews |
| Books, California, Children, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, Colbern Stuart III, Cole Stuart, dirty legal tactics, family law court, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, Government Abuse, Health & Nutrition, Judge Christine Goldsmith, Judge Lisa Schall, judicial abuse, Legal, life extension, Lyndolyn Stuart, Lynn Stuart, police abuse, San Diego, San Diego Superior Court, United States |
Cole Stuart Arrested During Family Law Protest
In the wake of what appears to be a wrongful arrest of California Coalition for Families and Children co-founder and president Cole Stuart, the evidence is building that one of the primary culprits in this matter is the San Diego County Bar Association (SDCBA).
We’ve obtained copy of computer file containing a letter directed to Patrick L. Hosey, President of the San Diego County Bar Association. In the letter, Cole Stuart describes the events of the April 15, 2010, family law seminar sponsored by the SDCBA at which their staff and private security guards allegedly handcuffed and removed him from the event. This is despite the facts that he is a licensed attorney who paid for admission to the event, the arrest warrant for him was obtained in an irregular fashion that suggests judicial misconduct was involved, and the San Diego Police Department (SDPD) and San Diego Sheriff Department officers on the scene wanted to wait until after the event to make an arrest.
SDPD officers pointed out that it was highly unusual for an arrest warrant to be issued over a misdemeanor alleged violation of a temporary restraining order. Possibly even more unusual is that the TRO was not served on Cole Stuart until April 16, two days after the issue of the arrest warrant tied to the TRO and one day after he had already been arrested.
Read more…
| Bonnie Dumanis, California, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, Child Custody, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith, Colbern Stuart III, Cole Stuart, Divorce, Domestic Violence, false abuse allegations, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Judge Christine Goldsmith, Judge Lisa Schall, Judge Lorna Alksne, Lyndolyn Stuart, Lynn Stuart, malicious mom, Patrick Hosey, police abuse, San Diego, San Diego County Bar Association, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, San Diego Police Department, San Diego Superior Court, SDPD, temporary restraining order, United States |
The United States of America and many of its state and local governments are civil rights and human rights violators of large proportions. One recent case of such violations is getting a lot of attention. Richard Fine is a Los Angeles political prisoner who has been locked in solitary confinement in county jail for approaching 15 months without any charges, opportunity for bail, or due process. He’s there because he exposed a bribery scandal and challenged the corrupt judges and governments of Los Angeles and California to stop the bribery. The response was to shut him down at every attempt to get the problems corrected. When he wouldn’t give up, Judge David Yaffe threw him in jail to silence him with the full cooperation and participation of corrupt Sheriff LeRoy Baca who is enforcing the illegal imprisonment. Yet as much as many citizens are burying their heads in the sand and pretending judicial and government abuse can’t happen to them, it is not only happening widely but is poised to get much worse.
Read more…
| Barack Obama, California, David Vitter, family law court, Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, George LeMieux, Government Abuse, James Inhofe, Jefferson Sessions, John McCain, John Thune, Judge David Yaffe, judicial abuse, judicial corruption, Legal, Los Angeles, political prisoner, Richard Fine, Roger Wicker, S.3081, Saxby Chambliss, Scott Brown, Sheriff LeRoy Baca, United States, wrongful imprisonment |
Protecting citizens from crime is a good goal. Technology has contributed many new tools to the effort such as burglar alarms, car security systems, and cell phones. But some technological tools have vast potential for abuse. GPS monitoring devices being used for family law and civil restraining orders are one such application fraught with serious abuse potential.
GPS Monitoring Raises Risks of Convincing But False Accusations
The potential for false accusations and harassment is aggravated dangerously if GPS tracking devices are used in family law and civil restraining order cases in which there has not been any conviction in a criminal court. That’s exactly the common case for many people falsely accused of domestic violence who have temporary retraining orders (TROs) slapped on them with no evidence, no chance to contest the false allegations, and no due process. This is business as usual for abusive judges like Lorna Alksne and Lisa Schall of the San Diego Superior Court as well as other similarly abusive judges across the United States. They issue such orders routinely without even a shred of evidence and no chance for a defense until much later.
Read more…
| Bonnie Russell, California, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, Cole Stuart, dirty legal tactics, Divorce, Domestic Violence, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Government Abuse, GPS tracking, Judge Lisa Schall, Judge Lorna Alksne, Ken Newell, Legal, partner violence, perjury, police abuse, protective order, restraining order, San Diego, San Diego Superior Court, TRO, United States |
On April 15, CCFC co-founder and attorney Cole Stuart was arrested in what appears to be a stunt staged by San Diego family law system employees, possibly including Judge Lorna Alksne and Judge Lisa Schall. It appears incontrovertible that the impending CCFC protest at the San Diego County Bar Association family law seminar on April 15 was well-known to court employees starting on April 14, the day on which an arrest warrant was issued for Cole Stuart.
We have observed there was a spike in activity on our web site by employees of the San Diego Superior Court on that, less than two days after we posted our article discussing the impending CCFC protest at the SDCBA family law seminar. While this doesn’t prove judicial bias on its own, it shows these judges were likely aware of the impending protest. It is also consistent with the opinion that San Diego judges viewed having Cole Stuart arrested as an opportunity to quash vociferous political opponents by abusing their authority.
Read more…
| California, California Coalition for Families and Children, CCFC, dirty legal tactics, Divorce, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Government Abuse, Judge Lisa Schall, Judge Lorna Alksne, Legal, police abuse, San Diego, San Diego Police Department, San Diego Sheriff's Department, San Diego Superior Court, Stephen Doyne, United States |
CCFC co-founder Cole Stuart was recently wrongfully arrested due to what appears to be manipulation of the police by his ex-wife Lynn Stuart and possibly various elements of the San Diego family law system. While malicious alienating parents using courts and police to abuse their children’s other parent is commonplace particularly in a broken family court system such as that in San Diego, she has been aided at this by a particularly dirty San Diego lawyer. Lynn Stuart hired Jeffrey Fritz. He has earned a reputation as an attorney who is a “shark” who will resort to all manners of abusive and unethical tactics to “win” cases for his clients while driving up huge billings that severely damage the finances of all but the very wealthiest. He typically attracts high-conflict clients such as Lynn Stuart.
Read more…
| Bill Eddy, borderline personality disorder, California, Child Custody, Cole Stuart, dirty legal tactics, Divorce, Domestic Violence, false accusations in divorce, family law court, high conflict personalities, Jeffrey Fritz, Legal, Lynn Stuart, narcissistic personality disorder, perjury, personality disorder, police abuse, San Diego, San Diego Superior Court, United States, William Eddy |
Donna Anderson wrote ”Red Flags of Love Fraud – 10 Signs You’re Dating a Sociopath” to explain how to detect if your romantic relatioship might be with a sociopath. If you didn’t realize this soon enough and had a child, she’s got some other advice for you on how to cope with the problems of trying to co-parent with such a person.
On her website, I happened across a very good posting on LoveFraud.com titled LETTERS TO LOVEFRAUD: Tips for co-parenting with a sociopath containing advice on how to co-parent with a sociopath. Sociopaths are people who manage to portray themselves to the general public as friendly, caring, nice people but in reality they are manipulative, deceitful, and endeavor to hurt others to get what they want. Some of the common sociopaths you are likely to find in family law courts are people who are “acting out” Borderlines, Narcissists, and Antisocials. Their morality can be summed up in one sentence: If it gets me what I want or will hurt somebody I don’t like, it’s A-OK.
Read more…
| antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Children, co-parenting, Divorce, Domestic Violence, emotional abuse, family law court, narcissistic personality disorder, Parental Alienation, personality disorder, shared parenting, sociopath |
Eric Moelter has started to speak up a bit about what has happened in the false sexual abuse and child custody abduction case of Cindy Dumas v. Eric Moelter now that all three boys are living with him once again. He believes their mother Cindy Dumas suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder and has been waging a distortion campaign against him for years.
Read more…
| BPD, Child Abduction, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Children, Courts, CPS, Crime, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, Government Abuse, NPD, Parental Alienation, Partner Violence, Police, Prosecutor, Psychology |
| California, Child Abduction, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Children, Cindy Dumas, Damon, Divorce, emotional abuse, Eric Moelter, false abuse allegations, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Government Abuse, Judge Lorna Alksne, Judge Michael Smyth, judicial child abuse, Legal, parental abduction, Parental Alienation, personality disorder, San Diego, San Diego Superior Court, sexual abuse, United States, verbal abuse |
(Note: This article was published together with Personality Disordered Abusers in Psychological Evaluations. That article focuses on problems encountered when psychological evaluations are used in an attempt to deal with a personality disordered abuser in a family law dispute.)
William Eddy is an attorney and licensed clinical social worker who has written many excellent books on personality disorders and how they manifest in family law battles. In his recent books, he has taken to calling people with personality disorders who engage in extensive and unreasonable litigation as High Conflict Personalities (HCP). He’s stated that a large part, possibly as much as 40%, of the litigation in family courts involves HCPs.
Yet despite the prevalence of these psychological problems in family law courts, judges often fail to understand the problems and are prone to reward the abusers for their conduct. This is likely to intensify the abuses because they have been positively reinforced with rewards such as sole physical and/or legal custody, financial awards, or simply emotional satisfaction of seeing the hated target being berated by a judge the abuser manipulated.
Read more…
| BPD, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Children, Civil Rights, Courts, Crime, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Marriage, NPD, Parental Alienation, Partner Violence, Psychology |
| Bill Eddy, borderline personality disorder, California, Child Abuse, Child Custody, Divorce, Domestic Violence, emotional abuse, false abuse allegations, false accusations in divorce, family law court, Government Abuse, narcissistic personality disorder, personality disorder, San Diego, United States, William Eddy |
Recent Comments