Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home PicketedWritten by: Chris Print This Article
Use of Our Content (Reposting and Quoting)
Recently, we heard from a reliable source that embattled San Diego Judge Lorna Alksne spoke at yet another family law seminar in June 2010. She speaks at many of these events to rally her friends and associates in the family law profession to keep the courts humming with the profitable business of financially victimizing and violating the rights of children and families. There was talk both of her being furious over her home being picketed by an increasingly angry public and a job change she is planning. She anticipates being out of the San Diego family law system by the end of 2011.
Alksne Planning to Bow Out Under Fire
Apparently the bad reputation Alksne has earned and the increasing public animosity towards her has finally had some effect on her career plans. She reportedly mentioned that she plans to stay in control over the San Diego family law courts for another year before she moves to another position.
There have allegedly been death threats made against her. There is public chatter about law enforcement investigations of the threats on web sites of those upset at Alksne’s abusive and biased conduct.
Picketing of her courthouse on Sixth Avenue has become routine as more and more parents understand that she aids and abets the ongoing abuse, corruption, and misconduct of family law courts and “professionals” in the county.
Hundreds of parents and concerned community members have signed a petition calling for the recall of Judge Lorna Alksne.
Alksne Wastes Taxpayer Funds
Alksne’s misconduct is not only resulting in the abuse of children and parents, it is also costing San Diego taxpayers plenty. The government has assigned more full-time security personnel to her and has assigned Sheriff’s Department staff and as well as agents from other agencies (the FBI has been mentioned) to root out the people responsible for the alleged threats.
When Alksne goes out in public, such as to family law seminars, she has a large posse of gun-toting uniformed and plainclothes security officers around her. But even in her own courtroom, in a well-guarded courthouse with security scanners and plentiful armed deputies, she still gets added security as her armed bailiff isn’t enough. This is a reflection of how abusive she has been to children and parents alike, worse than even most of the other corrupt judges in the county.
Why does a lowly county judge warrant security measures more comprehensive than those for many state officials? Because she is viewed as an abusive tyrant whom parents and their families blame for harming their children.
Alksne Supports Judicial Tyranny
The public should be asking what this judge who has created such a continuous public uproar is doing on the bench. Alksne has managed to prove to the public that she will whitewash, spin, hide, and obfuscate at every opportunity rather than to admit San Diego families are being harmed unjustly by the family law tyrants in our midst. She considers spin-control more important than reform and justice. Power first, money second, children — well, what San Diego judge would bother to care about them with Alksne setting the example she has?
As Alksne and her ilk’s reign of terror has intensified for years, it’s become more evident to the public that judicial tyrants are a far greater danger to the public than even irresponsible politicians. While politicians may mud-sling and vilify each other, they generally don’t target average citizens for attack in their own homes and don’t directly abuse their children.
Family law judges in San Diego and across the United States have amassed far too much power and have zero interest in justice. They avail themselves of opportunities to use their judicial power to silence and crush their own opponents as well as anybody who annoys a friend or associate and later appears in their courtrooms. This is not just a problem in San Diego. We hear of similar abuses elsewhere in California, Illinois, Missouri, Texas, and many other locales.
Lies are facts in San Diego’s kangaroo courts. The judges know this well as many of them lie and deceive others about ex-parte communications, connections with parties appearing in cases, relationships with attorneys, evidence admitted or suppressed, and more.
Even when egregious outcomes are publicly disclosed, their leaders, including Lorna Alksne, have the unbridled arrogance to claim the courts are doing a wonderful job.
Although most judges might have the grace to blush over revelations of in-your-face incompetence, keep in mind, San Diego, as demonstrated by Supervising Family Court Judge Lorna Alksne, is different than most.
In a rare display of a complete lack of credibility of family courts regarding the long over-due arrest of pedophile Bud Parson, (Family court judge DeAnn Salcido first apologized to Parson for having to undergo a CPS investigation, then granted him full custody of his and Joyce Murphy’s daughter for six years in spite of Murphy’s repeated attempts to protect their daughter), Judge Alksne’s cheerleading, “Family court judges are doing an excellent job.” was beyond the pale.
Ultimately, media exposure prompted Parson to plead guilty to six counts of child molesting split between two separate victim. He got off very lightly, sentenced to just six years in prison.
The outcomes are often decided once the judge knows who the litigants are, prior to impartial hearing of evidence and testimony.
If it looks like another mom making wild allegations, treat her like she’s crazy and strip her of all contact with her children rather than putting in safeguards to ensure both risks of abuse and false allegations are minimized.
If the litigant is a dad being driven crazy by court order violations, false allegations, and interference with custody, treat him like a violent criminal and proclaim “I’m a tough on crime judge” simply because he lost his temper and used a swear word in an email pointing out how his ex is refusing to even let the kids talk with him on the phone despite court orders.
If a litigant is a cop or other government employee, like the former husbands of many litigants in these courts, treat them like kings and the other parents like criminals. Judges want to keep law enforcement on their side, after all they need armed officers willing to hunt down, intimidate, arrest, and perhaps even kill the growing numbers of angry parents who have had enough with this system and want their children back.
Far too many judges today are responsible for what amounts to terrorism against the citizens, children and parents alike. The public can see that as more and more parents are banned from their children’s lives without any just cause, simply at the whim of a corrupt and abusive judge who decides she knows what is best and damn the plentiful evidence to the contrary.
We are not talking about parents who are extremists and pariahs like the Randy Weavers and Branch Davidians of the world. While the US Federal Government has wrongly murdered many of those people, the general populace didn’t feel so threatened by that because they could see clear “us vs. them” distinctions even if they didn’t approve of government agents shooting children in the back and torching homes.
But with San Diego family law tyranny, many of these victimized parents are normal people who find themselves in the middle of a nasty marital dispute and suddenly discover that there is no justice in family law courts. That’s particularly true for those who have managed to tick off anybody in the political establishment. With so many people on the government payrolls in the county, it is not hard to inadvertently end up on some government troll’s bad side.
Even if you have not annoyed anybody in the government, you had better hope that your future ex-spouse is not connected with the power-elite nor capable of providing them any substantive favors. That’s because it is often evident that a well-connected person, be it some real estate mogul or a news reporter, is going to get preferential treatment in San Diego courts.
Could Picketing Judges’ Homes Force Change?
The picketing of Alksne’s home may be one of the elements encouraging her to leave her comfy family court abuser position, raising the possibility that picketing the homes of other abusive and corrupt San Diego judges might have similar effects. Considering the number of San Diego judges involved in crimes against children and families, aggrieved parents and their families could probably keep themselves busy for years picketing the abusive judges currently populating the bench in the county.
Even gender-oriented court reform groups in the county are starting to set aside their differences to protest the growing court corruption. While malicious moms and dastardly dads may be nominal enemies, corrupt judges are even more of a threat so many of them have come to believe that battle must be delayed for now. It’s a bit like the US and the Soviet Union (as played by the gender-oriented parent groups) joining forces to fight Nazi Germany (as played by the San Diego courts).
Obviously I’d like to share with you some of the details of the picketing of Alksne’s home. If a recipe could be found to force a corrupt judge from office, it should be widely published and practiced. The judicial tyranny we have today in San Diego and in many American cities is a dire threat to the future of this nation and the freedom of its citizens. If picking a judge can turn around such a threat, the citizens should be aware of just how to do it.
Not being among the protesters and with my usual sources pleading ignorance of the picket, I turned to the Internet, figuring that Google and other search engines might make quick work of locating details. Given the many sites featuring criticisms of Lorna Alksne and other corrupt family law judges, I expected something to turn up.
What did I find? Nothing.
That a judge has so angered so many people that they picketed her home and she’s furious about it and apparently considering a job change seems like it should be making the mainstream news, but it isn’t.
Media Aligned with Courts to Hide Public’s Anger
Why isn’t the growing crisis of confidence in the abusive family law courts being reported in the local mainstream media?
One major reason is that there is an alignment of interests between the mainstream media and the power elite. Follow the power and money and potential threats to each and you’ll begin to understand what is happening.
Pretend for a moment that you are one of Alksne’s ilk, a corrupt San Diego judge. Would you willingly cooperate with the abuse a child by depriving him of a good parent to prevent a potentially damaging story being spread by a TV or radio news reporter who is a nasty abusive parent of that child? Almost any San Diego judge today would pick child abuse as the better option. Kids don’t get on the TV or radio to expose corruption and they don’t have money to donate to political campaigns, so what corrupt judge would care about children?
That’s why you see vicious parents who appear to be child abusing parental alienators like TV reporter Lynn Stuart getting away with apparent child abuse and violations of court orders with impunity. Between being a reporter and her ex, Cole Stuart, ticking off Lorna Alksne and other family law judges by organizing aggrieved San Diego parents to push for court reform, tyrants like Judge Lisa Schall and Judge Christine Goldsmith have decreed that parental alienation child abuse is acceptable conduct for their young son. Lynn Stuart has reportedly consistently refused to allow her son to see, speak with, or have any contact with his father despite court orders to the contrary. Even after Lynn Stuart’s stunt of falsely accusing her ex of alcohol abuse was exposed as such by Judge Joel Wohlfeil after he inflicted four months of alcohol testing on the father only to find not a single bit of evidence to support her apparently malicious false allegations, she reportedly stepped up the abuse by intensifying the interference with contact.
Self-serving judges like Lisa Schall and Christine Goldsmith won’t dare hold Lynn Stuart in contempt of court because they would rather see a child suffer than to have a bad headline about themselves on the television. In the calculus of power, the interests of a little boy mean nothing to a power-hungry abusive judge, especially when you can quash the story by sealing a case file and have a corrupt boss like Lorna Alksne conspiring with you and your colleagues.
The San Diego public cannot trust the mainstream local media to do an accurate or responsible job reporting on court corruption and abuse. While not all local media figures are child abusing parental alienators like Lynn Stuart appears to be, many of them are connected via friends and family to the judges and other power elite figures in the county. They have a vested interest in keeping the corruption and abuse covered up, and if and when the time presents itself, they will be rewarded for doing so.
Corruption and Abuse Details Hidden Until Parents Step Forward
The public may ask where the details on corruption are. It is frankly hard to get details for all but the most egregious cases of abuse for two main reasons. One is that the judges seal cases and block public access to information. The other is that the judges are effectively engaging in extortion and blackmail against parents.
Consider this, if you as a parent are down to seeing your child for only a few hours per week and have been told if you dare mention anything about the case in public that you may be punished (meaning you will not see your child again, perhaps for months or years), do you think you would risk it?
Many of the parents who are risking disclosure are so concerned about their children’s well-being that they are convinced their kids could be physically injured or seriously abused if they do not speak up.
But far more parents do not speak up as they may not have such concerns of immediate abuse by the other parent against their children, so they stay quiet, enabling the courts to abuse their families further. The courts continue the extortion and blackmail while they suck their finances into the vast family law system employing thousands of lawyers, psychologists, visitation and exchange monitors, and other court-appointed professionals. These parents know that nobody in the government will help them and that their children are pawns in a big game involving money and power that has nothing to do with the self-serving judicial drivel about “the best interests of the children.”
As the mainstream media mostly stays silent on the abuse, it helps ensure that few parents will step forward and expose the corrupt courts for what they are. Parents see there is nobody there to help them and so they stay quiet out of fear of losing the last bit of contact with their children. As such, tyrants such as Lorna Alksne stay in power, freely abusing and terrorizing thousands of families for the profit and job security of themselves and their friends and associates.
|Child Custody, Children, Civil Rights, Courts, Crime, Divorce, Family, Government Abuse, Legal, Parental Alienation, Police, Politics, Prosecutor|